Tricki
a repository of mathematical know-how
Add article
Navigate
Tags
Search
Forums
Help
Top level
›
Different kinds of Tricki article
›
Front pages for different areas of mathematics
›
Algebra front page
›
Group theory front page
›
How to solve problems about finite groups
View
Edit
Revisions
To prove facts about finite groups, use induction on the order
Title:
*
Area of mathematics:
*
A comma-separated list of areas of mathematics to which this article applies. Use ">" to tag in a subcategory. Example: Analysis > Harmonic analysis, Combinatorics
Keywords:
A comma-separated list of keywords associated with this article. Example: free group
Used in:
A comma-separated list of examples of where this technique is used. Example: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
Parent articles:
Order
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
Body:
[QUICK DESCRIPTION] One approach to proving results about finite groups is by using induction on the order of the group. The general idea is that one has many constructions of subgroups, such as the formation of the centre, or of centralizers of elements, or of normalizers of subgroups, to which one can hope to apply an inductive argument. [PREREQUISITES] Basic group theory. [note article incomplete] More examples wanted [/note] [EXAMPLE] Cauchy's theorem states that if a prime $p$ divides the order of a finite group $G$, then $G$ contains an element of order $p$. We present a proof of Cauchy's theorem via induction on the order of $G$. (Many other proofs are possible; a simple proof using an approach via group actions is [[Proving results by letting a group act on a finite set | here]].) We first consider the decomposition of $G$ into conjugacy classes. If $g$ is any element of $G$, then the stablizer of $G$ under the action of $G$ via conjugation is equal to $C_G(g)$, the centralizer of $g$ in $G$. Thus the number of conjugates of $g$ is equal to the index $[G:C_G(g)],$ and so if $\{g_1,\ldots,g_n\}$ is a set of conjugacy class representatives of $G$, then [maths] |G| = \sum_{i= 1}^n [G:C_G(g_i)]. [/maths] Note that $[G:C_G(g)] = 1$ if and only if $C_G(g) = G$, or equivalently, if and only if $g$ lies in the centre $Z$ of $G$. Thus if we label our conjugacy class representatives so that the first $m$ representatives are the elements of the centre, then we may rewrite the above equation in the form [maths] |G| = |Z| + \sum_{i=m+1}^n [G:C_G(g_i)], [/maths] where the sum is over the non-central conjugacy class representatives, i.e. over those conjugacy class representatives whose conjugacy class contains more than one element. (This formula is known as the [[w:conjugacy class | class equation]].) Now suppose that $p$ does not divide $[G:C_G(g_i)]$ for some $i = m+1,\ldots,n$. Then since $p$ does divide $|G|$, we find that $p$ divides the order $C_G(g_i)$. Since $g_i$ is not central in $G$ (by assumption), we find that $C_G(g_i)$ is a proper subgroup of $G$. Thus, by induction, we may conclude that $C_G(g_i)$ contains an element of order $p$. Since $C_G(g_i)$ is a subgroup of $G$, we also get an element of order $p$ in $G$, and so are done. It remains to consider the case when $p$ divides $[G:C_G(g_i)]$ for all $i = m+1,\ldots,n$. Since $p$ divides the order of $|G|$, we then conclude from the class equation that $p$ divides $|Z|$. Since $Z$ is an abelian group, this reduces Cauchy's theorem for a general finite group to the case of a finite abelian group. Cauchy's theorem for finite abelian groups follows immediately from the [[w:abelian group | fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups]]. However, we can also prove it directly, using the same strategy of induction on the order. Thus suppose that $A$ is a finite abelian group, and that $p$ is a prime dividing $|A|$. Let $a$ be any non-identity element of $A$, and let $B$ be the subgroup of $A$ generated by $a$. The order of $B$ is equal to the order of $a$, which we denote by $r$. If $p$ divides $r$, then $a^{r/p}$ is an element of $B$, and hence of $A$, of order $p$, and we are done. If $p$ does not divide the order of $B$, then we form the quotient $A/B$. (It is here that we use the fact that $A$ is abelian, so as to be certain that its subgroup $B$ is normal.) Since $a$ was chosen to be non-trivial, the order of $A/B$ is less than the order of $A$, and since $p$ does not divide the order of $B$ by assumption, it must divide the order of $A/B$. By induction, we conclude that $A/B$ must have an element of order $p$, say $\overline{a}$. Let $a' \in A$ be a preimage of $\overline{a}$ under the natural projection $A \rightarrow A/B$ (or, if you prefer, a representative of the coset $\overline{a}$). Since the image $\overline{a}$ of $a'$ in $A/B$ has order $p$, the order of $a'$ must be divisible by $p$. Thus, if we let $r'$ denote this order, the element $a^{r'/p}$ of $A$ has order $p$. This completes the proof of Cauchy's theorem in the abelian case.
This is a stub
A stub is an article that is not sufficiently complete to be interesting.
Notifications
File attachments
Changes made to the attachments are not permanent until you save this post. The first "listed" file will be included in RSS feeds.
Attach new file:
Images are larger than
640x480
will be resized. The maximum upload size is
1 MB
. Only files with the following extensions may be uploaded:
jpg jpeg gif png svg
.
Revision information
Log message:
An explanation of the additions or updates being made to help other authors understand your motivations.
Search this site:
Recent articles
View a list of all articles.
Littlewood-Paley heuristic for derivative
Geometric view of Hölder's inequality
Diagonal arguments
Finding an interval for rational numbers with a high denominator
Try to prove a stronger result
Use self-similarity to get a limit from an inferior or superior limit.
Prove a consequence first
Active forum topics
Plenty of LaTeX errors
Tutorial
A different kind of article?
Countable but impredicative
Tricki Papers
more
Recent comments
I don't think this statement
choice of the field
Incorrect Image
Article classification
Higher dimensional analogues
more