Tricki
a repository of mathematical know-how
Add article
Navigate
Tags
Search
Forums
Help
Top level
›
What kind of problem am I trying to solve?
›
Proving "for all" statements
›
Prove the result for some cases and deduce it for the rest
View
Edit
Revisions
Prove the result for a representative of each equivalence class
Title:
*
Area of mathematics:
*
A comma-separated list of areas of mathematics to which this article applies. Use ">" to tag in a subcategory. Example: Analysis > Harmonic analysis, Combinatorics
Keywords:
A comma-separated list of keywords associated with this article. Example: free group
Used in:
A comma-separated list of examples of where this technique is used. Example: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
Parent articles:
Order
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
Body:
[QUICK DESCRIPTION] Sometimes one can prove a result for every element of a set with an equivalence relation on it by proving the result for a representative of each equivalence class and proving that if the result is true for some element then it is true for all elements that are equivalent to that element. [PREREQUISITES] Basic algebraic concepts, the notion of an equivalence relation. Other prerequisites vary from example to example. [EXAMPLE | Jordan normal form] Two $n\times n$ matrices $A$ and $B$ are ''similar'' if there is an invertible matrix $P$ such that $PAP^{-1}=B.$ A slightly strange result is that every $n\times n$ matrix is similar to its transpose. It is strange because it is hard to interpret as a statement about linear maps. Given that it is true, it is also surprisingly hard to prove. However, we can get a handle on the problem by observing that if $A$ is similar to $B$ and the result is true for $A$, then the result is true for $B$. Indeed, $B$ is similar to $A$, which is similar to $A^T$, which is similar to $B^T.$ The relationship of similarity is an [[w:equivalence_relation|equivalence relation]], so once we have made this observation, all we have to do is prove the result for one element of each equivalence class. A good idea under such circumstances is to try to find the "nicest" or "simplest" representative of each equivalence class. This job is done for us by the Jordan normal form theorem, which says, as its name suggests, that every matrix is similar to a matrix in [[w:Jordan_normal_form|Jordan normal form]]. It is straightforward to prove the result for a Jordan block -- take $P$ to be the matrix that reverses the order of the basis elements (that is, the matrix with 1s on the "wrong" diagonal and zeros everywhere else) -- and from that one can get the result for an arbitrary matrix in Jordan normal form. Therefore the result is proved. [note contributions wanted] This article could do with some more examples. [/note]
This is a stub
A stub is an article that is not sufficiently complete to be interesting.
Notifications
File attachments
Changes made to the attachments are not permanent until you save this post. The first "listed" file will be included in RSS feeds.
Attach new file:
Images are larger than
640x480
will be resized. The maximum upload size is
1 MB
. Only files with the following extensions may be uploaded:
jpg jpeg gif png svg
.
Revision information
Log message:
An explanation of the additions or updates being made to help other authors understand your motivations.
Search this site:
Recent articles
View a list of all articles.
Littlewood-Paley heuristic for derivative
Geometric view of Hölder's inequality
Diagonal arguments
Finding an interval for rational numbers with a high denominator
Try to prove a stronger result
Use self-similarity to get a limit from an inferior or superior limit.
Prove a consequence first
Active forum topics
Plenty of LaTeX errors
Tutorial
A different kind of article?
Countable but impredicative
Tricki Papers
more
Recent comments
I don't think this statement
choice of the field
Incorrect Image
Article classification
Higher dimensional analogues
more