Tricki
a repository of mathematical know-how
Add article
Navigate
Tags
Search
Forums
Help
Top level
›
What kind of problem am I trying to solve?
›
Techniques for obtaining estimates
›
Estimating integrals
View
Edit
Revisions
Bound the integrand by something simpler
Title:
*
Area of mathematics:
*
A comma-separated list of areas of mathematics to which this article applies. Use ">" to tag in a subcategory. Example: Analysis > Harmonic analysis, Combinatorics
Keywords:
A comma-separated list of keywords associated with this article. Example: free group
Used in:
A comma-separated list of examples of where this technique is used. Example: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
Parent articles:
Order
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
Body:
[QUICK DESCRIPTION] This is a generalisation of the [[base times height]] bound: instead of bounding the magnitude $|f(x)|$ of the integrand by some fixed constant $M$, instead bound it by some quantity $M(x)$ which still depends on $x$, but in a "simpler" fashion than the original integrand $f$, where "simpler" means "easier to integrate". Then one clearly has $|\int_E f(x)\ dx| \leq \int_E M(x)\ dx$. Note that in many cases, one is prepared to lose a multiplicative constant C in the final bound on the integral, in which case one is also free to lose a constant on the integrand, i.e. one will settle for $|f(x)| \leq C M(x)$ rather than $|f(x)| \leq M(x)$. [PREREQUISITES] Undergraduate calculus [EXAMPLE] Obtain an upper bound for $\int_0^\infty \frac{1}{a^7 + x^7}\ dx$, where $a >0$ is a parameter. The integrand $\frac{1}{a^7+x^7}$ looks somewhat unpleasant to deal with by exact integration methods (substitution, integration by parts, contour integration, etc.). However, we only seek an upper bound. Note that up to a factor of two, a sum $X+Y$ of two positive quantities is comparable to the maximum $\max(X,Y)$ of these quantities. Taking reciprocals, we see that $\frac{1}{a^7+x^7}$ is comparable to $\min( \frac{1}{a^7}, \frac{1}{x^7} )$ (in fact, the former is less than or equal to the latter). Now, the quantity $\min( \frac{1}{a^7}, \frac{1}{x^7} )$ is simpler to integrate than $\frac{1}{a^7+x^7}$. Why? Well, freshman calculus already tells us how to integrate $\frac{1}{a^7}$ and $\frac{1}{x^7}$ separately. And dealing with a minimum (or maximum) in an integrand is not too scary; one simply needs to divide the region of integration into two sets, one where the first term attains the minimum, and one where the second term does, and [[divide and conquer]]. In this case, $\frac{1}{a^7}$ attains the minimum when $x \leq a$, and $\frac{1}{x^7}$ does otherwise. Thus we obtain an upper bound of [maths]\int_0^a \frac{1}{a^7}\ dx + \int_a^\infty \frac{1}{x^7}\ dx[/maths] which can now be easily computed via freshman calculus as [maths] \frac{a}{a^7} + \frac{1}{6} a^{-6} = \frac{7}{6} a^{-6}.[/maths] In the converse direction, to get a lower bound, observe on the first region $x \leq a$, $a^7 + x^7$ never exceeds $2a^7$, and on the second region it never exceeds $2x^7$, so we obtain a lower bound of [maths] \int_0^a \frac{1}{2a^7}\ dx + \int_a^\infty \frac{1}{2x^7}\ dx = \frac{7}{12} a^{-6}.[/maths] Thus our upper and lower bounds only differ by a factor of two (this is the same factor of two that appeared earlier in the discussion). Note that one can also guess the bound by the base times height heuristic. If one sketches a graph of the function $\frac{1}{a^7+x^7}$, one sees that it has "height" about $\frac{1}{a^7}$ and is concentrated on a "base" of width about $a$, so it is reasonable to expect the final integral to be of size about $a^{-6}$, which is indeed what happens. [GENERAL DISCUSSION] Of course, for this strategy to be effective, the upper bound $M(x)$ should be easier to integrate than the original function $f(x)$. See "[[Which integrals are simpler to integrate]]?" for more discussion of this issue. The bound is only efficient if one believes that $f(x)$ is generally not much smaller than $M(x)$, and also if one believes that $f(x)$ does not oscillate enough to provide additional cancellation. [remark] The strategy can be thought of as the analogue for integrals of the [[w:comparison test]], which is ''the'' basic strategy for bounding infinite sums. [/remark]
This is a stub
A stub is an article that is not sufficiently complete to be interesting.
Notifications
File attachments
Changes made to the attachments are not permanent until you save this post. The first "listed" file will be included in RSS feeds.
Attach new file:
Images are larger than
640x480
will be resized. The maximum upload size is
1 MB
. Only files with the following extensions may be uploaded:
jpg jpeg gif png svg
.
Revision information
Log message:
An explanation of the additions or updates being made to help other authors understand your motivations.
Search this site:
Recent articles
View a list of all articles.
Littlewood-Paley heuristic for derivative
Geometric view of Hölder's inequality
Diagonal arguments
Finding an interval for rational numbers with a high denominator
Try to prove a stronger result
Use self-similarity to get a limit from an inferior or superior limit.
Prove a consequence first
Active forum topics
Plenty of LaTeX errors
Tutorial
A different kind of article?
Countable but impredicative
Tricki Papers
more
Recent comments
I don't think this statement
choice of the field
Incorrect Image
Article classification
Higher dimensional analogues
more