Tricki
a repository of mathematical know-how
Add article
Navigate
Tags
Search
Forums
Help
Top level
›
What kind of problem am I trying to solve?
›
Proving "for all" statements
›
Prove the result for some cases and deduce it for the rest
View
Edit
Revisions
Use conservation laws and monotonicity formulae to obtain long-time control on solutions
Title:
*
Area of mathematics:
*
A comma-separated list of areas of mathematics to which this article applies. Use ">" to tag in a subcategory. Example: Analysis > Harmonic analysis, Combinatorics
Keywords:
A comma-separated list of keywords associated with this article. Example: free group
Used in:
A comma-separated list of examples of where this technique is used. Example: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
Parent articles:
Order
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
Body:
[QUICK DESCRIPTION] Suppose one has a solution to an evolution equation (such as a PDE) which one controls well at some initial time (e.g. $t=0$). To then establish control for much later (or much earlier) times $t$, one effective approach is to exploit a conservation law or monotonicity formula, which propagates control of some quantity at one time to control of a related quantity at other times. To establish a conservation law or monotonicity formula for a quantity $Q(t)$, one often differentiates $Q$ in time, and rearranges it (using such tools as [[integration by parts]]) until it is manifestly zero, non-negative, or non-positive. [PREREQUISITES] Partial differential equations [EXAMPLE] '''Problem''': Let $u: \R \times \R \to \R$ be a smooth solution to the nonlinear wave equation $-u_{tt} + u_{xx} = u^3$ which is compactly supported in space at each time. Show that the $H^1(\R)$ norm of $u(t)$ grows at most linearly in $t$. '''Solution''' (Use conservation of the energy $\int_\R \frac{1}{2} u_t^2 + \frac{1}{2} u_x^2 + \frac{1}{4} u^4\ dx$ and Sobolev embedding...) [GENERAL DISCUSSION] A more advanced version of this technique is to exploit ''almost'' conserved quantities or ''almost'' monotone quantities - quantities whose derivative is not quite zero (or non-negative, or non-positive), but is instead small (or non-negative up to a small error, etc.). Monotonicity properties can also be used in the contrapositive: if a quantity $Q(t)$ is known to be monotone, but on the other hand $Q(t_1)=Q(t_2)$ for some times $t_1, t_2$, then $Q$ must be constant between $t_1$ and $t_2$; in particular, $Q'(t)=0$ for all such $t$. This fact can lead to some useful consequences (especially if one knows how to write $Q'(t)$ in a "manifestly non-negative" way, e.g. as a sum or integral of squares).
This is a stub
A stub is an article that is not sufficiently complete to be interesting.
Notifications
File attachments
Changes made to the attachments are not permanent until you save this post. The first "listed" file will be included in RSS feeds.
Attach new file:
Images are larger than
640x480
will be resized. The maximum upload size is
1 MB
. Only files with the following extensions may be uploaded:
jpg jpeg gif png svg
.
Revision information
Log message:
An explanation of the additions or updates being made to help other authors understand your motivations.
Search this site:
Recent articles
View a list of all articles.
Littlewood-Paley heuristic for derivative
Geometric view of Hölder's inequality
Diagonal arguments
Finding an interval for rational numbers with a high denominator
Try to prove a stronger result
Use self-similarity to get a limit from an inferior or superior limit.
Prove a consequence first
Active forum topics
Plenty of LaTeX errors
Tutorial
A different kind of article?
Countable but impredicative
Tricki Papers
more
Recent comments
I don't think this statement
choice of the field
Incorrect Image
Article classification
Higher dimensional analogues
more