Tricki
a repository of mathematical know-how
Add article
Navigate
Tags
Search
Forums
Help
Top level
›
Different kinds of Tricki article
›
Front pages for different areas of mathematics
›
Analysis front page
›
Numerical analysis front page
View
Edit
Revisions
Use an approximation as if it were exact
Title:
*
Area of mathematics:
*
A comma-separated list of areas of mathematics to which this article applies. Use ">" to tag in a subcategory. Example: Analysis > Harmonic analysis, Combinatorics
Keywords:
A comma-separated list of keywords associated with this article. Example: free group
Used in:
A comma-separated list of examples of where this technique is used. Example: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
Parent articles:
Order
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
Body:
[QUICK DESCRIPTION] Often we want to apply a method to a general class of functions, but we only know how to do this for a certain class of functions (e.g., polynomials). Then use an approximation to our general function from our certain class, and act as if our approximation were exact. A more sophisticated version, is to use this to ''update'' a guess by means of this approach, obtaining successively (we hope) approximations to the unknown we wish to compute. [PREREQUISITES] Linear algebra, calculus. [EXAMPLE] Numerical integration is mostly done this way. We take a polynomial interpolant $p$ of a given function $f:[a,b]\to\R$ at certain chosen points $x_1<x_2<\cdots<x_N$ and then use $\int_a^b p(x)\,dx$ as the approximation to $\int_a^b f(x)\,dx$. The error in the result is usually best estimated by the error in the interpolant, or by noting that the method is exact for all polynomials of up to a certain degree (at least $N-1$), and then using the error in the interpolant to estimate the error in the integral. (See also [[Interpolation and approximation]].) [EXAMPLE] Solving linear or nonlinear equations iteratively. For a linear system of equations, $Ax=b$ where we wish to find $x$, if we have an approximate matrix $B\approx A$ for which we can readily solve systems $Bz=d$, we can compute $x$ iteratively via: [maths]\begin{align} B\delta_i&=b-Ax_i\\ x_{i+1} &=x_i + \delta_i. \end{align}[/maths] This is known as ''iterative refinement''. For nonlinear systems we use the Taylor series approximation to 1st order: $f(x+\delta)=f(x)+\nabla f(x)\delta$, and then set the linearization to zero. If we update the value of $x$ to be $x\gets x+\delta$, this gives the Newton--Raphson method. [GENERAL DISCUSSION] See also [[As a first approximation, neglect lower order terms]].
This is a stub
A stub is an article that is not sufficiently complete to be interesting.
Notifications
File attachments
Changes made to the attachments are not permanent until you save this post. The first "listed" file will be included in RSS feeds.
Attach new file:
Images are larger than
640x480
will be resized. The maximum upload size is
1 MB
. Only files with the following extensions may be uploaded:
jpg jpeg gif png svg
.
Revision information
Log message:
An explanation of the additions or updates being made to help other authors understand your motivations.
Search this site:
Recent articles
View a list of all articles.
Littlewood-Paley heuristic for derivative
Geometric view of Hölder's inequality
Diagonal arguments
Finding an interval for rational numbers with a high denominator
Try to prove a stronger result
Use self-similarity to get a limit from an inferior or superior limit.
Prove a consequence first
Active forum topics
Plenty of LaTeX errors
Tutorial
A different kind of article?
Countable but impredicative
Tricki Papers
more
Recent comments
I don't think this statement
choice of the field
Incorrect Image
Article classification
Higher dimensional analogues
more