Quick description
If you can partition a set
into
pieces, of sizes
, then
has size
. In particular, if all the pieces have the same size
, then
has size
. These obvious facts can be surprisingly useful in calculating the size of various sets.
An equivalent statement is that, if a set
is mapped into a set
of size
, and each
has a preimage of size
, then
has
elements. In particular, if all preimages have the same size
, then
has size
.
The "functional" statement has a sort of dual: if you know that a set
has size
and can find a function
such that every element of
has exactly
preimages in
, then
has size
. Sometimes the best way to calculate the size of
is to find a set
that is bigger but simpler in structure, map it into
and exploit this principle.
Prerequisites
Basic mathematical notation.
General discussion
If
is a finite set and
is a partition of
with
, then
-
The size of
is 
-
The number of partitions
is given by
. -
If a set
can be mapped bijectively to the collection
then
This is a special case of counting using a bijection.
One common way to partition a set is by defining an equivalence relation on it. Two examples below demonstrate this.
Example 1
The binomial coefficients are obtained as an application of partitioning.
Let
be a finite set. Let
be all permutations of
of length
. We know that (see Example 1 on this page)
Let us call two elements of
equivalent if they are permutations of each other. This is an equivalence relation on
with each of its equivalence classes containing
elements. It follows that the total number of equivalence classes is
Each equivalence class represents a subset of
with
elements. It follows that the number of subsets of
of size
is
Example 2
Let
and let
be the set of ordered strings of length
from the alphabet
where the repetition of the same letter is allowed. We would like to compute
.
Let
be the set of all possible configurations of
distinct flags on
poles, where on each pole multiple flags are allowed and the order of the flags is important. From Example 2 on this page we know that
Let us call two elements of
equivalent if they can be obtained from one another by permuting the labels of the flags. There are
flags, and therefore
permutations of flag labels. Then each equivalence class of this relation contains
factorial elements. Now note that each class can be represented uniquely by an element of
. For example, for
and
,
represents the equivalence class of elements of
such that there are three flags in the first pole, two flags in the second pole and one each on the third and the fourth poles. It follows that the number of ordered strings from the alphabet
of length
is
Example 3
An important identity in elementary number theory is that
. Here,
is Euler's totient function:
is defined to be the number of integers in
that are prime to
. To prove this identity, we will partition a (conveniently chosen) set of size
into pieces, argue that there is one piece for each
dividing
, and show that the piece corresponding to
has size
.
Consider the set
of positive integer multiples of
lying in
; it is clear that
has
elements. We classify these fractions according to the denominator that appears when we reduce them to lowest terms. For example, the case
would yield the following partition:
It's clear that each such denominator is a divisor of
, and that a non-empty piece of the partition is associated with each divisor
of
, since
belongs to the piece associated with
.
Now, how many elements are in the
-piece of the partition? To answer that, we just look at the numerators of the reduced fractions: all the numerators appearing in the
-piece must be prime to
(by definition of "lowest terms") and distinct. Further, any
that is prime to
must appear as some numerator, since
is in lowest terms, lies in
, and equals
, so it belongs to
. The identity follows.
Tricki
Comments
Post new comment
(Note: commenting is not possible on this snapshot.)