Tricki
a repository of mathematical know-how
Add article
Navigate
Tags
Search
Forums
Help
Top level
›
What kind of problem am I trying to solve?
›
Techniques for obtaining estimates
View
Edit
Revisions
Insert constraints into estimates and error terms
Title:
*
Area of mathematics:
*
A comma-separated list of areas of mathematics to which this article applies. Use ">" to tag in a subcategory. Example: Analysis > Harmonic analysis, Combinatorics
Keywords:
A comma-separated list of keywords associated with this article. Example: free group
Used in:
A comma-separated list of examples of where this technique is used. Example: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
Parent articles:
Order
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
Body:
[QUICK DESCRIPTION] In analysis and analytic number theory, one sometimes obtains estimates for expressions involving several variables or parameters subject to various constraints concerning their respective sizes. If these estimates have to be carried along and transformed in substantial ways, or if many of them involving different constraints must be combined at some point, it may be useful (if it is possible) to incorporate the constraints inside the estimates by adding terms which make the estimate trivial if the constraints are not satisfied, and reduce to the useful estimate otherwise. This is similar in spirit to the use of a characteristic function of a set to represent a summation or integration condition, as described in [[Getting rid of nasty cutoffs]] for example. [PREREQUISITES] Basic calculus or even simple combinatorics and sums. [GENERAL DISCUSSION] The idea of the trick is best explained with concrete elementary examples. [EXAMPLE] Consider the inequality [math] \sqrt{x}\leq x. [/math] This is only valid if $x\geq 1$. However, if we write [math] \sqrt{x}\leq x+1 [/math] the inequality is valid for $x\geq 0$, and is not asymptotically worse than the previous one when $x$ gets large. [EXAMPLE] Suppose you have a function $S(n,p)$ depending on an integer $n\geq 1$ and a prime number $p$, and that you know the upper bound [math] |S(n,p)|\leq p [/math] for all $n$, and [math] |S(n,p)|\leq \sqrt{p} [/math] if $p$ does not divide $n$. If these estimates are used extensively later on, with different values of $n$ and $p$, sorting out which of the two applies may become a bookkeeping nightmare. Writing [math] |S(n,p)|\leq \sqrt{(n,p)}\sqrt{p} [/math] where $(n,p)$ is the GCD of $n$ and $p$ encapsulates both statements neatly and is much easier to carry around and combine with other estimates. [note article incomplete]More examples of this are planned (in particular more convincing ones).[/note]
This is a stub
A stub is an article that is not sufficiently complete to be interesting.
Notifications
File attachments
Changes made to the attachments are not permanent until you save this post. The first "listed" file will be included in RSS feeds.
Attach new file:
Images are larger than
640x480
will be resized. The maximum upload size is
1 MB
. Only files with the following extensions may be uploaded:
jpg jpeg gif png svg
.
Revision information
Log message:
An explanation of the additions or updates being made to help other authors understand your motivations.
Search this site:
Recent articles
View a list of all articles.
Littlewood-Paley heuristic for derivative
Geometric view of Hölder's inequality
Diagonal arguments
Finding an interval for rational numbers with a high denominator
Try to prove a stronger result
Use self-similarity to get a limit from an inferior or superior limit.
Prove a consequence first
Active forum topics
Plenty of LaTeX errors
Tutorial
A different kind of article?
Countable but impredicative
Tricki Papers
more
Recent comments
I don't think this statement
choice of the field
Incorrect Image
Article classification
Higher dimensional analogues
more