Tricki
a repository of mathematical know-how
Add article
Navigate
Tags
Search
Forums
Help
Top level
›
Different kinds of Tricki article
›
Front pages for different areas of mathematics
›
Analysis front page
›
Real analysis front page
›
I have a problem to solve in real analysis
›
I have a problem about the convergence of a sequence
›
Prove that a sequence converges by passing to a subsequence
View
Edit
Revisions
To prove convergence, find a rapidly converging subsequence
Title:
*
Area of mathematics:
*
A comma-separated list of areas of mathematics to which this article applies. Use ">" to tag in a subcategory. Example: Analysis > Harmonic analysis, Combinatorics
Keywords:
A comma-separated list of keywords associated with this article. Example: free group
Used in:
A comma-separated list of examples of where this technique is used. Example: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
Parent articles:
Order
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
Body:
[QUICK DESCRIPTION] Any subsequence of a convergent sequence also converges to the limit of the original sequence. One can reverse this idea and study first the convergence of a special subsequence of the original sequence. This study will be simpler than studying the original sequence because one is allowed to choose as well behaving a subsequence as one wishes. If the chosen subsequence converges, this can be useful in several ways. First, if there is no apriori candidate for limit, the limit of the subsequence identifies a unique candidate for the limit of the whole sequence 2) if the chosen subsequence approximates the whole sequence well then this can be used to show that the whole sequence converges to the limit of the subsequence. [EXAMPLE] The proof of the strong law of large numbers. Richard Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, Second edition, Chapter 1. This theorem concerns a sequence $X_1(\cdot)$, $X_2(\cdot)$,..., $X_n(\cdot)$ of pairwise independent, identically distributed random variables on a probability space $(\Omega, {\mathcal F}, P)$ with ${\mathbb E}|X_i| < \infty$. The strong law of large numbers states that [math slln0] \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i(\omega) \rightarrow {\mathbb E}[X_1] [/math] almost surely. That is, there is a measurable subset $\Omega' \subset \Omega$ with $P(\Omega') = 1$ and [eqref slln0] holds for every $\omega \in \Omega'$. The proof involves several ideas, one of which is passing to a simple convergent subsequence. The argument begins with a [[truncation]] (see also [[replace your sequence with a simpler one]]): we replace the random variables $X_n$ with $Y_n = X_n 1_{\{|X_n| \le n\}}$. (See the truncation article on why truncation makes sense and for thoughts on where to truncate). We give the details of this replacement as it demonstrates well several interesting ideas. Let $T_n = Y_1 + Y_2 + \cdots + Y_n$. $T_n$ and $S_n$ can differ only on a subset of $N = \{ \omega: X_n(\omega) \neq Y_n(\omega) $ for infinitely many $n\}$ or $N = \{ |X_n | > n,$ infinitely often $ \}$ as this type of statements are commonly made in probability theory. (A link to an article on zero one laws, Borel Cantelli lemma). By Borel Cantelli Lemma we know that $P(N)=0$ if $\sum_{n=1} P( |X_n|>n) < \infty$. In the current problem this sum is intimately related to the assumptions of our problem. We see this with an integration using [[Control_level_sets | control level sets]]: [maths] \sum_{n=1}^\infty P ( |X_n| > n )< \int_0^\infty P(|X_1| > x ) dx = {\mathbb E}[|X_1|] < \infty. [/maths] Rest of the steps: * Replace $Y_n$ with $Y_n^+$ (Durrett cites [http://www.math.uic.edu/people/profile?mscsid=etemadi Etemadi] as the source of this idea) * Choose a subsequence of $Y_{k_n}$ for which simple Borel Cantelli and Chebyshev inequality works (here the expression $\sum var(Y_k) / k^2 $ naturally comes up and one needs to bound this sum; once again control level sets are used). One also uses Fubini's theorem to change the order of a double sum. The choice of the subsequence: i think the key idea here is to choose a partition $k_1 < k_2 < k_3 <\cdots < k_n < \cdots$ of the time index so that the intervals $k_{n+1} -k_n$ are getting large enough with $n$ to make Chebyshev's inequality sufficiently precise to imply the desired convergence. Durrett uses $k_n = \lfloor \alpha^n \rfloor$ and in the final argument $\alpha$ is sent to $1$. * Use monotonicity (which the first item brought) to show that the chosen subsequence approximates the whole sequence well.
This is a stub
A stub is an article that is not sufficiently complete to be interesting.
Notifications
File attachments
Changes made to the attachments are not permanent until you save this post. The first "listed" file will be included in RSS feeds.
Attach new file:
Images are larger than
640x480
will be resized. The maximum upload size is
1 MB
. Only files with the following extensions may be uploaded:
jpg jpeg gif png svg
.
Revision information
Log message:
An explanation of the additions or updates being made to help other authors understand your motivations.
Search this site:
Recent articles
View a list of all articles.
Littlewood-Paley heuristic for derivative
Geometric view of Hölder's inequality
Diagonal arguments
Finding an interval for rational numbers with a high denominator
Try to prove a stronger result
Use self-similarity to get a limit from an inferior or superior limit.
Prove a consequence first
Active forum topics
Plenty of LaTeX errors
Tutorial
A different kind of article?
Countable but impredicative
Tricki Papers
more
Recent comments
I don't think this statement
choice of the field
Incorrect Image
Article classification
Higher dimensional analogues
more