a repository of mathematical know-how

Interchange integrals or sums

Quick description

When faced with a double integral, such as

 \int_\R (\int_\R f(x,y)\ dy)\ dx

try interchanging the integrals and see if this simplifies the expression. This is good in situations in which f looks easy to integrate in x but not in y. (See "Which integrals are simpler to integrate".) However, surprisingly often, even if you just interchange the order of integration without thinking in advance what you will get out of it, something good happens.

Of course, one can similarly interchange sums and integrals, or sums with sums; the latter technique is also known as double counting. The technique is also closely related to linearity of expectation.


Undergraduate real analysis

Example 1

Let's play around with the Riemann zeta function

= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^s}

where we restrict attention initially to the case \hbox{Re}(s)>1, so there is no difficulty making the sum converge. We will try to expand \frac{1}{n^s} as an integral, so that we can get something interesting by interchanging sums and integrals.

The starting point is the scaling identity

 \int_\R f(nt) |t|^s \frac{dt}{|t|} = \frac{1}{|n|^s} \int_\R f(t) |t|^s \frac{dt}{|t|}

for any f which is bounded and rapidly decreasing. One could try a number of different functions f here, but a particularly nice one is the Gaussian = e^{-\pi t^2} (basically because it is its own Fourier transform). Inserting this, we soon obtain the identity

 \int_\R e^{-\pi n^2 t^2} |t|^s \frac{dt}{|t|} = \pi^{s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \frac{1}{|n|^s}

(where \Gamma is the Gamma function) so on summing over all non-zero n and interchanging the integrals we obtain

 \int_\R (\Theta(t)-1) |t|^s \frac{dt}{|t|} = 2 \pi^{s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \zeta(s)

where = \sum_{n \in \Z}  e^{-\pi n^2 t^2} is the Theta function.

Now we use the fact that e^{-\pi t^2} is its own Fourier transform. Combining this with the Poisson summation formula we obtain the identity

 \Theta(t) = \frac{1}{|t|} \Theta(\frac{1}{t});

inserting this identity into the above identity (and dividing into the regions |t| \leq 1 and |t| > 1) we soon arrive at the formula

 \pi^{s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \zeta(s) = \int_1^\infty (\Theta(t)-1) (t^s + t^{1-s}) \frac{dt}{t} - \frac{1}{s} - \frac{1}{1-s}.

This identity has two important consequences. Firstly, the rapid decay of \Theta ensures that the right-hand side makes sense for all complex numbers s (except for the poles at s=0,1), and thus explicitly defines a meromorphic continuation of \pi^{s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \zeta(s) and hence \zeta(s). Secondly, the right-hand side is symmetric with respect to the reflection s \mapsto 1-s, leading to the celebrated functional equation

 \pi^{s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \zeta(s) = \pi^{(1-s)/2} \Gamma((1-s)/2) \zeta(1-s).

Example 2

(More suggestions welcome!)

General discussion

In order to justify the interchange of integrals, one can use results such as the Fubini-Tonelli theorem. Alternatively, one can create an epsilon of room to regularize, discretize or truncate the integrand to the point where the interchange of integrals can be justified, and then take limits at the end of the argument.

Sometimes it is worthwhile to expand an integrand into a series or integral of other expressions for the sole purpose of applying the interchanging integrals trick. For instance, this is one major motivation for using Fourier identities.


Examples for reversing summation and integration

As an example, how about the proof via theta-functions of the functional equation for the Riemann-zeta function (or L-functions)?

Nice suggestion!

I've added it in as an example. More suggestions would of course also be good :)

Another example

This one in \R^n, how to change a n-dimensional L^p-norm into a 1-dimensional integral:

 f(x)>\lambda\}| d\lambda

(Here the absolute value means the Lebesgue measure)

It is used, for example, to prove Marcinkiewicz's Interpolation Theorem.

The proof of this simple fact is:

 f(x)>\lambda\}| d\lambda

where we used Fubini to go from step 2 to step 3.

Post new comment

(Note: commenting is not possible on this snapshot.)

Before posting from this form, please consider whether it would be more appropriate to make an inline comment using the Turn commenting on link near the bottom of the window. (Simply click the link, move the cursor over the article, and click on the piece of text on which you want to comment.)